Sebastian Schuberth wrote: > And that's exactly what defining __NO_INLINE__ does. Granted, defining > __NO_INLINE__ in the scope of string.h will also add a "#define > strcasecmp _stricmp"; but despite it's name, defining __NO_INLINE__ > does not imply a performance hit due to functions not being inlined > because it's just the "strncasecmp" wrapper around "_strnicmp" that's > being inlined, not "_strnicmp" itself. What I don't understand is why the header doesn't use "static inline" instead of "extern inline". The former would seem to be better in every way for this particular use case. See also <http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/tech/inline.html>, section "GNU C inline rules". Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html