Re: pack v4 trees with a canonical base

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> An eventual optimization to index-pack when completing a pack would be
> >> to attempt the encoding of appended tree objects into the packv4 format
> >> using the existing dictionary table in the pack, and fall back to the
> >> canonical format if that table doesn't have all the necessary elements.
> >
> > Yeah, it's on the improvement todo list. The way pack-objects creates
> > dictionaries right now, the tree dict should contain all elements the
> > base trees need so fall back is only necessary when trees are have
> > extra zeros in mode field.
> 
> Careful.
> 
> There may be trees in the wild that record 100775 or 100777 in the
> mode field for executable blobs, which also need to be special
> cased.

All the file mode bits are always preserved.  So this is not really a 
special case as far as the pack v4 encoding is concerned.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]