Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reject non-ff pulls by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:52:31PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:47:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > You are in favor of an _option_ to allow people to forbid a pull in
> > a non-ff situation, and I think other people are also in
> > agreement. So perhaps:
> > 
> >  - drop jc/pull-training-wheel and revert its merge from 'next';
> > 
> >  - update Felipe's series with a bit of tweak to make it less
> >    impactful by demoting error into warning and advice.
> > 
> > would be a good way forward?
> 
> I think that would address the concern I raised, because it does not
> create a roadblock to new users accomplishing their task. They can
> ignore the warning, or choose "merge" as the default to shut up the
> warning (and it is easy to choose that if you are confused, because it
> is what git is doing by default alongside the warning).

I think we need to make sure that we give instructions for how to go
back if the default hasn't done what you wanted.  Something like this:

    Your pull did not fast-forward, so Git has merged '$upstream' into
    your branch, which may not be correct for your project.  If you
    would rather rebase your changes, run

        git rebase

    See "pull.mode" in git-config(1) to suppress this message in the
    future.

?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]