On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:44:04 +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
...
> I'd rather not go this route. Allowing refs/heads/master and local
> branches that forked from it in refs/heads/master/{a,b,c,...} could
> be a potentially useful future enhancement,
Want! We're currently going the route of naming the branches
master
feature/master
feature/subfeature/master
to allow feature/subfeature/topic, and feature/subfeature in the first place.
(Other hierarchy separator candidates were ugly, shell-unwieldy, already
commonly used within branch names, or illegal.)
Andreas
--
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html