Re: [PATCH] dir: remove dead code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 08.09.2013 08:09, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
Remove dead code around remove_dir_recursively().

This basically reverts ae2f203e (clean: preserve nested git worktree in subdirectories). t7300 still seems to pass, though. I wonder why.


Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  dir.c | 21 ++++-----------------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
index 910bfcd..2b31241 100644
--- a/dir.c
+++ b/dir.c
@@ -1464,11 +1464,11 @@ int is_empty_dir(const char *path)
  	return ret;
  }

-static int remove_dir_recurse(struct strbuf *path, int flag, int *kept_up)
+int remove_dir_recursively(struct strbuf *path, int flag)
  {
  	DIR *dir;
  	struct dirent *e;
-	int ret = 0, original_len = path->len, len, kept_down = 0;
+	int ret = 0, original_len = path->len, len;
  	int only_empty = (flag & REMOVE_DIR_EMPTY_ONLY);
  	int keep_toplevel = (flag & REMOVE_DIR_KEEP_TOPLEVEL);
  	unsigned char submodule_head[20];
@@ -1476,8 +1476,6 @@ static int remove_dir_recurse(struct strbuf *path, int flag, int *kept_up)
  	if ((flag & REMOVE_DIR_KEEP_NESTED_GIT) &&
  	    !resolve_gitlink_ref(path->buf, "HEAD", submodule_head)) {
  		/* Do not descend and nuke a nested git work tree. */
-		if (kept_up)
-			*kept_up = 1;
  		return 0;
  	}

@@ -1504,7 +1502,7 @@ static int remove_dir_recurse(struct strbuf *path, int flag, int *kept_up)
  		if (lstat(path->buf, &st))
  			; /* fall thru */
  		else if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
-			if (!remove_dir_recurse(path, flag, &kept_down))
+			if (!remove_dir_recursively(path, flag))

kept_down could have been set to 1 here...

  				continue; /* happy */
  		} else if (!only_empty && !unlink(path->buf))
  			continue; /* happy, too */
@@ -1516,22 +1514,11 @@ static int remove_dir_recurse(struct strbuf *path, int flag, int *kept_up)
  	closedir(dir);

  	strbuf_setlen(path, original_len);
-	if (!ret && !keep_toplevel && !kept_down)
+	if (!ret && !keep_toplevel)
  		ret = rmdir(path->buf);

... and would have prevented the rmdir() call here.

Is the removed code really dead?  And if not, why does t7300 still pass?

-	else if (kept_up)
-		/*
-		 * report the uplevel that it is not an error that we
-		 * did not rmdir() our directory.
-		 */
-		*kept_up = !ret;
  	return ret;
  }

-int remove_dir_recursively(struct strbuf *path, int flag)
-{
-	return remove_dir_recurse(path, flag, NULL);
-}
-
  void setup_standard_excludes(struct dir_struct *dir)
  {
  	const char *path;
-- 1.8.4.100.gde18f6d.dirty


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]