Re: Remote's 'currently active branch' not HEAD?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Krey <a.krey@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:02:50 +0000, Michael Schubert wrote:
> ...
>> > happen to have the HEAD *commit* as their tip.
>> 
>> Yes, it picks the first of those:
>> 
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/168144
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> And pity, the patches didn't make it that time either...

And the key article in that discussion by Peff points to
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/102039 with
"I had some complaints at the time, but re-reading it I don't see
anything that would prevent us from revisiting the topic now."
Reading the patch series from 2008 again, I do agree with J6t's
comment that it should be just a regular capability, i.e. like what
Peff suggests in his comment on [PATCH 5/6 (v2)], but other than
that, I do not see anything that would prevent us from revisiting
the topic now, either.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]