Hi, On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On the git repository, using MinGW: > > Using cygwin: > > > > IOW MinGW wins hands down with an average 0.33s vs cygwin with an average > > 0.75s. (I am fairly certain that you must not trust sys times.) > > Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP? Both with NO_MMAP=YesPlease. > Clearly, for a packed repository most of the overhead should be in > getting to the pack data itself (as everything else is pure userspace). Right. That's why I did the test on the _same_ repository. (Not just both git repositories, but in the same path on the same machine.) That said, I find the numbers quite convincing. On a (much weaker equipped) Linux bux, it takes 0.65s and 1.2s, respectively. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html