Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > How does your solution work when dirty submodules are involved and > submodule status is included?f Badly ;-). I didn't notice the subcommand call for submodules summary. It's a bit more tricky to get right, as the "git sumbodule summary --for-status" call did not know whether it was called from commit or from status. I fixed this by adding a --[no-]-display-comment-char to git submodule summary. >> +test_expect_success 'status with status.displayCommentChar=false' ' >> + "$PERL_PATH" -pi -e "s/^\# //; s/^\#$//; s/^#\t/\t/" expect && > > Perl's -i does not work on Windows when no backup file extension is given. > Therefore, please use a temporary file or "... -pi.bak ..." OK I didn't know that. I went the old good sed+mv way. New series comming. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html