Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fix interactive rebase short SHA-1 collision bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... when 'next' is ready to be rewound after 1.8.4
> is released, a replacement to the original series should be sent with
> all the incremental patches squashed in.

It was more like "could, if you want to help us keep clean history
going forward", rather than "should" ;-) Thanks for resending.

I've locally queued this series after seeing the end-result matches
what has been cooking.

Traditionally we waited for a few days after a release to see if we
do not receive regression reports that require us to issue brown
paper bag fixes before rewinding "next" and opening a new cycle. I
am hoping that it will happen in a few days.

My responses may be slower than usual today (i.e. Monday 26th), as I
would need to be sitting in dentist's for a few hours.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]