Re: [PATCH 0/3] t3404 incremental improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> This set of patches was meant to be a re-roll of [1] addressing Junio's
>> comments, however [1] graduated to 'next' before I found time to work on
>> it further, so these are instead incremental patches atop 'next'.
>
> Just FYI, 'next' will be rewound once the upcoming release is done,
> so we have a chance to rewind and squash.

How would we go about this? Is there something I can do to streamline
the squashing?

Unfortunately, the various fix-up patches do not have a one-to-one
correspondence to the original three patches in 'next'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]