Re: [PATCH] repack: rewrite the shell script in C.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 21.08.2013 15:07, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

But as these follow up changes heavily rely on the very first patch
I will first try to get that right, meaning accepted into pu.
Then I can send patches with these proposals such as making more
functions.

I think it's better to get the style right before, to avoid doubling the
review effort (review a hard-to-review patch first, and then re-review a
style-fix one).

If by "style fix" you mean "coding style fix", I agree.

But, IMO, refactoring the long function can wait because the long function is easier to compare to the shell script, and I think that is more important later when you need to dig the history.

It is already too late to save review effort.

-- Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]