Re: [PATCH 0/2] git-config and large integers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:41:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> If this applied on the writing side, I would understand it very
> much, i.e.
> 
> 	$ git config --int32 foo.size 2g
>         fatal: "2g" is too large to be read as "int32".

It does, by the way. When you request a type on the writing side, we
normalize (and complain in the same way as we do when reading).

> and as a complement it may make sense as a warning mechanism to also
> error out when existing value does not fit on the "platform" int, so
> your 
> 
> >>   $ git config --int foo.size
> >>   fatal: bad config value for 'foo.size' in .git/config
> 
> might make sense (even though I'd suggest being more explicit than
> "bad value" in this case---"the value specified will not fit when
> used in a variable of type int on this platform").

Yes, the error message is terrible, and I think an extra patch on top to
improve it is worth doing. But note that I am not introducing that error
here at all. On 32-bit systems, we already correctly range-checked and
produced that error. It is only on 64-bit systems that the range check
was flat out wrong. It checked against "long"'s precision, but then cast
the result to an int, losing bits. A possibly worse example than the
negative one is:

  $ git config foo.bar 4g
  $ git config --int foo.bar
  0

Again, that is what git's internal code is seeing. And that is why
keeping the range check for git-config has value: it lets you see what
git would see internally.

> When .git/config is shared on two different boxes (think: NFS), the
> size of "int" might be different between them, so the logic to produce
> such a warning may have to explicitly check against int32_t, not
> platform int and say "will not fit in 'int' on some machines".

I don't really see the value in that. You can always write whatever you
like in the config file. The reader is responsible during parsing for
saying "Hey, I am 32-bit and I can't handle this". And we already do
that, and it works fine. So if you have an NFS-shared .git/config, and
you set "pack.deltacachesize" to "4g", a 64-bit machine will do fine
with that, and a 32-bit machine will complain. Which seems like the only
sane thing to do.

There are a few config options that use "unsigned long" that I would
argue should be "off_t" or something (for example,
core.bigFileThreshold, which cannot be more than 4G on a 32-bit machine,
simply because we can't represent the size. On the other hand, there is
probably a ton of stuff that does not work with 4G files on such a
system, because we use unsigned long all over the place inside the
code).
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]