Re: Understanding Git Under The Hood: Trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> writes:

> You seem to believe that the in-memory representation of trees have to
> be the same as the on-disk one. That's simply not true. Git cheats
> outrageously with internal formats for pretty much everything in order
> to squeeze out more performance.

While the last statement applies to other parts of the system, it is
not true for the in-core index design.  We always had a flat index,
and it is not cheating at all.  The original "tree" was also a flat
representation of everything under the sun, and hierarchical tree
objects came much later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]