Re: [PATCH] git-blame --incremental: don't use pager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> Although I'd apply it anyway, strictly speaking, I think this
> patch should not matter because any real Porcelain would be
> using this as an upstream of a pipe to its drawing engine.
> 
> Well, unless that Porcelain drives --incremental through a pair
> of ptys, but I do not think it is likely ;-).

Ha!, didn't think of that.  I still like it more without a pager
even if run on a terminal, because then you can *see* that it's
really incremental (without needing to unset PAGER).  I'm a
non-believer. ;-)

René
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]