Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, David Jeske <davidj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there currently any way to say "hey, git, show me what commits are
> dangling that might be lost in the reflog?"

How do you define dangling commits? When you do "git commit --amend",
the current commit will become dangling (in the sense that it's not
referred by any ref, but the commit exists) and those are just noise
in my opinion.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]