Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't we already do that?
>
>     Warning: you are leaving N commits behind, not connected to
>     any of your branches:
>
>         ... list of commits to be lost ...

This only shows on checkout... not reset, not submodule-update, nor
any other ways you can clobber a detached head.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]