Re: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Jeske wrote:

>                                  Ephemeral branch names would be
> local-only and would never be pushed.

That's how normal branch names behave (local branch names and remote
branch names live in different namespaces).  How would the proposed
detached HEAD replacement compare to them?  Would the temporary branch
created by checking out a random commit be automatically deleted when
checking out another branch, or would it be garbage-collected at some
point later?

Curious,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]