Re: [PATCH v4] gc: reject if another gc is running, unless --force is given

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When we see a recent lockfile created by a "gc" running elsewhere,
>> we do not set "should_exit".  Is that a good thing?  I am wondering
>> if the last two lines should be:
>>
>> -       !strcmp(locking_host, my_host) &&
>> -       !kill(pid, 0);
>> +       (strcmp(locking_host, my_host) || !kill(pid, 0));
>>
>> instead.
>
> Yes I think it should (we still have the 12-hour check to override
> stale locks anyway). Should I send another patch or you do it yourself
> (seeing that you have this chunk pasted here, you might have it saved
> somewhere already)

The above was typed in my MUA ;-), but it is an easy update I can do
so will do so anyway.

Thanks for double-checking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]