On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:39:58PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > For emacs users, it would even be better to tie it into emacs. That > way you're already at the line number looking at the source code when I agree that connecting it with the editor might be sensible; I'm not likely to work on an emacs version, though. :) One of my other long-standing annoyances with using "raw" git-blame is that it shows me a bunch of commits, but then I have to open a new window and cut and paste the hash to actually _see_ the commit. That's why I think something like tig makes sense, where you can jump between different views very easily. An editor extension should be able to do the same thing. > course, scrolling to the right part of the file is a pain. So > building it into the editor is not only convenient, but it avoids the > psychological effects that could make it seem slow because how long it > takes to fill the attribution for these first bits: Agreed, I noticed that as well (especially because the enormous font and spacing choices of GTK made sure you could only see the first couple of lines :) ). > is there?). I have no idea how you would hack this into Vim, other > than passing the line number into the GUI so it can open right into > the function that the developer was looking at. I'll look into what's out there for vim; there's quite a bit of extensibility if you buy into things like the perl support. -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html