Re: [PATCH] branch, commit, name-rev: ease up boolean conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/06/2013 08:46 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Stefan Beller
> <stefanbeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Now that the variables are readin by OPT_BOOL, which makes sure
> 
> Do you mean s/readin/read in/ ?
> 
> Or should it be s/readin/set/ ?
> 
>> to have the values being 0 or 1 after reading, we do not need
>> the double negation to map any other value to 1 for integer
>> variables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I think s/readin/set/ is best.
Also s/after reading/after parsing/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]