Re: More precise tag following

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > Okay, let's try to assume for now that nobody said "git blame".  
> > > Instead let's say:
> > > 
> > > git rev-list and git log (with or without -p) perform poorly when 
> > > invoked with a pathspec.
> > 
> > So what? You _will_ be interested in the _newest_ changes _99%_ of the 
> > time. And for these you don't need to wait 1:18, but 0:00.01 or so.
> 
> not if you are interested which commit introduced/changed a particular 
> line.

Wonderful. Say, you want to know who last changed the beginning of the 
function main() in git.c:

	$  git blame -L '/main(/,+20' git.c

What was your point again?

> > > This particular file has 64 revisions.  However there are ~ 375000 
> > > revisions in the converted repo.
> > 
> > "file version" trap! "file version" trap! "file version" trap!
> 
> call it path and retry.

Does not matter. Not one wit. Your reasoning is still harping on "file 
versions".

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]