Re: [PATCH V2] TIG: Fix to reinstate proper operation with no arguments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Drew Northup <n1xim.email@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This time, knowing for sure now that format->buf is not being used in
> the extant code path for any other purpose, I went ahead and
> initialized the whole thing to be sure that we don't find any other
> ghosts hiding in that buffer between uses. Just initializing the
> first byte fixes the near term problem but does not prevent the buffer
> initialization issue that this bug highlighted from rising up again
> later on.

Thanks applied with minor tidyup.

> diff --git a/tig.c b/tig.c
> index ba9ba98..c65bc43 100644
> --- a/tig.c
> +++ b/tig.c
> @@ -3104,8 +3104,12 @@ format_expand_arg(struct format_context *format, const char *name)
>  static bool
>  format_append_arg(struct format_context *format, const char ***dst_argv, const char *arg)
>  {
> +       int i;

Added space after the declaration.

>         format->bufpos = 0;
>
> +       for (i = 0; i < SIZEOF_STR; i++)

Changed this to use sizeof(format->buf) instead.

> +               format->buf[i] = 0;
> +
>         while (arg) {
>                 char *next = strstr(arg, "%(");
>                 int len = next ? next - arg : strlen(arg);
> --
> 1.8.0
>

-- 
Jonas Fonseca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]