On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:23:23PM -0700, Kyle J. McKay wrote: > >IMHO, this would be more clear as a single item, like: > > > > . User name (e.g., `user` in `https://user@xxxxxxxxxxx/repo.git`). If > > the config key has a user name it must match the user name in the > > URL exactly. If the config key does not have a user name, that > > config key will match a URL with any user name (including none). > > The only problem I have with a single item is what's the precedence? > Does an exact user match have the same precedence as an any-user > match? That would seem to be implied by having them as the same item > number. Separating them would appear to make it clearer that an > exact user match wins over an any user match, but if you have some > alternate text as a suggestion for the single item that clears that > up... :) Ah, I see your thinking now. You want to say "no username has less precedence than some username, which has less precedence than a path", so they are all elements of a single list. My thinking was "username has precedence less than path, and like a shorter path has less precedence than a longer path, an empty username has less precedence than a non-empty username". I agree my suggested wording would need to mention that explicitly. Like: . User name (e.g., `user` in `https://user@xxxxxxxxxxx/repo.git`). If the config key has a user name it must match the user name in the URL exactly. If the config key does not have a user name, that config key will match a URL with any user name (including none), but at lower precedence than a config key with a user name. I can live with it either way, though. They are just two ways of considering the same thing. > I am considering this text to address that: > > >All URLs are normalized (%-encodings are standardized, case-insensitive > >parts are lowercased, `./` and `../` path components are resolved) > >before > >attempting any matching (the password part, if embedded in the URL, > > but I'm not sure the extra verbiage makes it better. I think it may > just complicate the explanation unnecessarily? Yeah, I think I agree. Let's leave it out. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html