Re: [PATCH] commit: correct advice about aborting a cherry-pick

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:37:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Jeff King wrote:
> 
> > Your patch is just swapping out "git reset" for "cherry-pick --abort",
> > so I think that is a good improvement in the meantime.
> 
> Um, wasn't the idea of the original message that you can run "git
> reset" and then "git cherry-pick --continue"?

Maybe. :)

I missed that subtlety. Of my "three things you would want to do", that
means it was _trying_ say number 2, how to skip, rather than 3, how to
abort. If that is the case, then it should probably explain the sequence
of steps as "reset and then --continue" to make it more clear.

I.e., a patch is needed, but Ram's is going in the opposite direction.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]