Re: [PATCH 0/5] range-set and line-log bug fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't
> really consider this a good argument in favor of -Lfoo,+0 representing
> an empty range, and it's a very poor substitute for Michael Haggerty's
> more expressive proposal [1].
>
> [1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/229755/focus=230967

And here's the correct link to Michael's proposal:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/229755/focus=229995
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]