Re: StGIT and repo-config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/01/07, Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:58:38AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > The dictionary should also be pre-populated with the default values
> > (only in memory, not going to the config file on disk).

Pre-filling with default value has a drawback: it will create lots of
useless entries, especially for per-branch settings.  I'd rather let
the accessors return the default value when needed.  We can still
group all defaults in a single dictionnary.

What I meant is that it should pre-fill only with the default entries
needed by StGIT (probably around 10, see stgit.config.config_setup()).
The rest should be filled in when reading the config files.

> The most important point (to me) which came out of the discussion: It is
> not at all easy, or straight-forward, to handle multi-vars, i.e. multiple
> values for the same key.

Right, at least for filling a dictionnary.  We would need to declare
multi-valued parameters as such, which basically means we must only
try to read those config items we know about, which has all sorts of
consequences for config.py :)

But are multi-vars in the same file currently used? There is a clear
situation when a key is written in both the global and the
per-repository config files. From the StGIT point of view, it should
only care about the most specific one, i.e. the one in the per-repo
config and this would be the last one listed by git-repo-config (and
therefore overriding any preceding dictionary entry).

It would seem reasonable to start without a cache dictionnary, at
least for now.  After all, there are not so many config items to know
about in a single stgit run, so IIMHO we're only going to notice a
difference for the time needed to run the testsuite.

I'd like to avoid calling git-repo-config for every config option,
even if this wouldn't be noticeable (initially, but the tool would
evolve). If we don't care about multi-vars, as I said above, a
dictionary cache would make sense.

--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]