Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] t4203: test mailmap functionality directly rather than indirectly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> My current thinking is "no" --- the patch has as a justification "Now
>> we can test these aspects of .mailmap handling directly with a
>> low-level tool instead of using the tool most people will use, so do
>> so", which sounds an awful lot like "Reduce test coverage of commonly
>> used tools, because we can".
>
> Yes, that was exactly my reaction that prompted my response.

Does any of my follow-up commentary result in a different reaction? If
not, I'll drop patches 3 &4 in the re-roll.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]