Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Before, if (!one && !two) we would call contains(two, ...), and now we > will simply assume it is zero. Which I think is an improvement, as we > would have segfaulted before. I don't think it is a bug in the current > code (we would not ever feed the function two NULLs), but it is nice to > be more defensive. > > Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> Thanks, both. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html