Re: [RFD] Making "git push [--force/--delete]" safer?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't think that is necessary. We already have *two* options to
> force-push a ref: the + in front of refspec, and --force.

They mean exactly the same thing; the only difference being that "+"
prefix is per target ref, while "--force" covers everything, acting
as a mere short-hand to add "+" to everything you push.

If the "--lockref/--update-only-if-ref-is-still-there" option
defeats "--force", it should defeat "+src:dst" exactly the same way.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]