Re: [PATCH] Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Sorry for the late reply.

Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> You should use ${var:+if_set_to_nonempty_use_this} here.
>> ...
>> So munging it manually with sloppy "sed" script is simply wrong.
>
> Perhaps something like this on top of your patch squashed in?
>
> The  eval magic  lets  the  shell to  split  $strategy_opts back  into
> individual words (e.g. "--subtree=My Project" is a single word), strip
> the leading "--",  and then uses "rev-parse --sq-quote"  again to turn
> them into "-X 'subtree=My Project'" (two words), which can be inserted
> into a string later to be eval'ed.
>
>  git-rebase--interactive.sh | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index e558397..ae2da7a 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -83,8 +83,13 @@ rewritten_pending="$state_dir"/rewritten-pending
>  strategy_args=
>  if test -n "$do_merge"
>  then
> -	strategy_args="${strategy+--strategy=$strategy}
> - $(echo $strategy_opts | sed "s/'--\([^']*\)'/-X\1/g")"
> +	strategy_args=${strategy:+--strategy=$strategy}
> +	eval '
> +		for strategy_opt in '"$strategy_opts"'
> +		do
> +			strategy_args="$strategy_args -X$(git rev-parse --sq-quote "${strategy_opt#--}")"
> +		done
> +	'
>  fi
>  
>  GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP="$resolvemsg"
> @@ -246,7 +251,7 @@ pick_one () {
>  
>  	test -d "$rewritten" &&
>  		pick_one_preserving_merges "$@" && return
> -	output git cherry-pick $strategy_args $empty_args $ff "$@"
> +	output eval git cherry-pick "$strategy_args" $empty_args $ff "$@"
>  }
>  
>  pick_one_preserving_merges () {
> @@ -347,9 +352,8 @@ pick_one_preserving_merges () {
>  			msg_content="$(commit_message $sha1)"
>  			# No point in merging the first parent, that's HEAD
>  			new_parents=${new_parents# $first_parent}
> -			if ! do_with_author output \
> -				git merge --no-ff $strategy_args -m \
> -					"$msg_content" $new_parents
> +			if ! do_with_author output eval \
> +			'git merge --no-ff $strategy_args -m "$msg_content" $new_parents'
>  			then
>  				printf "%s\n" "$msg_content" > "$GIT_DIR"/MERGE_MSG
>  				die_with_patch $sha1 "Error redoing merge $sha1"
> @@ -357,7 +361,7 @@ pick_one_preserving_merges () {
>  			echo "$sha1 $(git rev-parse HEAD^0)" >> "$rewritten_list"
>  			;;
>  		*)
> -			output git cherry-pick $strategy_args "$@" ||
> +			output eval git cherry-pick "$strategy_args" "$@" ||
>  				die_with_patch $sha1 "Could not pick $sha1"
>  			;;
>  		esac

Indeed, this is much  better this way. Thank you very  much! I have just
squashed your patch into mine and ran successfully t3404 and t3421 tests
after rebasing my branch on top of current master.

I will send  the final patch in  another email. Of course,  feel free to
take authorship of the patch or add yourself as Signed-off-by.

Cheers,
-- 
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]