"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-receive-pack.txt b/Documentation/git-receive-pack.txt
> index 10e8c46..2fafc79 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-receive-pack.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-receive-pack.txt
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ The UI for the protocol is on the 'git-send-pack' side, and the
> program pair is meant to be used to push updates to remote
> repository. For pull operations, see 'git-fetch-pack'.
>
> -The command allows for creation and fast forwarding of sha1 refs
> +The command allows for creation and fast forwarding of SHA-1 refs
A good cleanup and correction. We've apparently been a little lax.
Its a noble and worthy goal to make the correction and I applaud
you for doing the hard work.
> diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
> index 3fefdac..814f78f 100644
> --- a/builtin-apply.c
> +++ b/builtin-apply.c
> @@ -1811,7 +1812,8 @@ static int apply_binary(struct buffer_desc *desc, struct patch *patch)
> "without full index line", name);
>
> if (patch->old_name) {
> - /* See if the old one matches what the patch
> + /*
> + * See if the old one matches what the patch
> * applies to.
> */
> hash_sha1_file(desc->buffer, desc->size, blob_type, sha1);
However I cannot help but feel that this hunk is unrelated to the
theme of this extremely large patch. I don't know how Junio feels,
but this late in the 1.5.0 series I'm a little leary of a 1600+
line patch which is changing so much code, even if its something
as trivial as the above hunk.
--
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html