Re: [PATCH 13/16] repack: consider bitmaps when performing repacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> @@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ do
>>       fullbases="$fullbases pack-$name"
>>       chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.pack"
>>       chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.idx"
>> +
>> +     test -f "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" &&
>> +     chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" &&
>> +     mv -f "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" "$PACKDIR/pack-$name.bitmap"
>
> If we see a temporary bitmap but somehow failed to move it to the
> final name, should we _ignore_ that error, or should we die, like
> the next two lines do?

I obviously decided against dying (as you can see on the patch, har
har), because the bitmap is not required for the proper operation of
the Git repository, unlike the packfile and the index.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]