On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:56:17PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > > Good eyes. But if we encourage people to run non-*.perl version, > > perhaps we should drop the executable bit from the source, no? > > But by default, I'd say consistency is most important so if other *.perl > are executable, we should do the same (otherwise my "ls" shows different > colors and it's ugly ;-) ). > > But it may make sense to change the convention, i.e. run a "chmod -x > *.perl" in Git's tree (in any case, people can still run "perl > foo.perl"). You'd probably want to also change the shell scripts, too, which are marked executable in the repo (but the source-able shell "libraries" are not). I don't remember the details, but I think there may be some magic with the --valgrind test option that depends on the executable bit to distinguish those two. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html