Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Replace the <repository> paragraph containing specific references to > $GIT_DIR/branches and "." with a generic urls-or-remotes paragraph > referencing the relevant sections in the git-fetch(1) manpage. > > Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt b/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt > index a24b8b6..0715892 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt > @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ OPTIONS > exit without talking to the remote. > > <repository>:: > - Location of the repository. The shorthand defined in > - $GIT_DIR/branches/ can be used. Use "." (dot) to list references in > - the local repository. > + The "remote" repository to query. This parameter can be > + either a URL or the name of a remote (see the GIT URLS and > + REMOTES sections of linkgit:git-fetch[1]). Looks OK. "." was written before "for-each-ref" and "branch --list" have become the standard way to list your local refs and branches, and I would agree that the description outlived its usefulness. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html