Junio C Hamano wrote: > Unfortunately, I tend to become bottleneck more often than you do, > so I do not think that would be a good use of my time. Besides, as Antoine points out, those numbers might well be useless (or worse, misleading). It's probably not worth the effort. > Which ones went unreviewed that are of high value? My observation can be boiled down to: I usually never get the opportunity to say something useful on most patches, because someone else already has; that has not been the case offlate. Probably some bias: I tried looking for examples and counter-examples, but the list is too large for individual patches to make any sense. I did run a script on git.git to see if there are any recent trends: if I'm right about patches not being reviewed, it must ultimately show up somewhere, right? v1.7.0..v1.7.1:: 702 jc (68), jn (50), jh (32), tr (22), jk (19), tr (19), mj (18), sb (15), bc (11), jl (10) v1.7.1..v1.7.2:: 772 jc (57), jn (56), Æa (32), mj (26), jk (21), tr (20), bc (19), gv (18), jn (18), cc (17) v1.7.2..v1.7.3:: 624 jn (117), Æa (64), jc (28), mm (23), nt (23), en (18), bc (17), tr (17), js (15), jl (12) v1.7.3..v1.7.4:: 1025 jn (89), nt (68), jc (59), en (54), jk (27), mj (26), Æa (25), ef (23), jh (23), ra (20) v1.7.4..v1.7.5:: 734 jn (90), Æa (79), jc (64), mj (40), jk (38), nt (31), bw (16), hv (13), pw (12), jl (10) v1.7.5..v1.7.6:: 650 jc (112), jk (51), mv (35), jn (28), jn (20), mj (16), jh (15), Æa (12), mk (11), jm (9) v1.7.6..v1.7.7:: 779 jc (105), jk (60), en (55), Æa (48), mh (44), js (19), di (16), jn (16), sr (15), tr (15) v1.7.7..v1.7.8:: 644 jc (85), mh (37), jk (31), rs (26), rr (23), jn (18), nt (15), bc (13), mj (10), ra (9) v1.7.8..v1.7.9:: 565 jc (82), jk (62), nt (24), mh (23), pw (18), jn (16), tr (15), bw (14), mv (11), pt (11) v1.7.9..v1.7.10:: 683 jc (84), jk (40), jn (27), nt (25), tr (21), jn (18), jx (15), zj (15), mh (13), th (11) v1.7.10..v1.7.11:: 925 jc (92), ap (73), jk (69), nt (39), rs (38), mh (37), jn (25), jx (19), rt (17), zj (17) v1.7.11..v1.7.12:: 548 jc (107), jk (51), mm (29), jx (15), mg (14), nt (14), pw (13), jn (12), as (7), cw (7) v1.8.0..v1.8.1:: 525 jc (55), jk (41), fc (32), nt (19), fa (15), mh (12), km (11), ta (11), mo (10), rr (9) v1.8.1..v1.8.2:: 957 jc (107), nt (53), jk (39), pw (35), jk (33), as (31), mh (31), fc (26), mv (23), wt (17) v1.8.2..v1.8.3:: 1005 fc (112), jc (95), jk (89), nt (35), jk (29), da (26), rr (24), tr (18), bc (15), jn (15) v1.8.3..master:: 497 fc (112), mh (60), rr (24), jc (23), rs (21), tr (18), kb (15), js (13), ra (12), nt (11) Meh, it looks normal. Sorry for the noise: I don't think there's any cause for worry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html