Re: [PATCH v2] pull: merge into unborn by fast-forwarding from empty tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think I got us off-track with my expectation of ending the one case
> with a conflicted index. But caring about that is even more unlikely.  I
> think Thomas's original patch is probably a happy medium.

OK, so should I consider it Reviewed-by: peff?

> As an orthogonal matter, we probably should reverse the order of
> updating HEAD and the index/working tree, as it does not make much sense
> to me to do the former if the latter is not possible (and that is the
> case even with the current code).

Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]