Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Conveniently enough we have seen both already ;-) Andrew's version for > commit.c could use a bit of refactorization, since it inserts the same > code in two places, but then it's about the same complexity as the > change for rebase. > > I'm not sure it's worth arguing about whether the "fixup! fixup!" is a > symptom of some underlying problem, and changing rebase is only tapering > over the symptom; or whether it's actually a useful distinction. If they are about the same complexity, then my instict tells me that it is a better design not to strip on the writing side. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html