Re: [PATCH 5/6] status: do not depend on flaky reflog messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> I have been assuming the "main" thing Duy wanted to do was the last
>> test (and the one below), but was this meant as an improvement for
>> "git status" output during that state?
>
> On what basis are you making that assumption? 

List archive helps.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/217342/focus=217444

Not just that single message, but a few messages in the discussion
that led to the design shows that we wanted both "at" and "from" to
mean something sensible, when a "checkout" initiated by the end-user
detached HEAD and we are not on any branch, even after making
commits or doing resets.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]