Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> But that is entirely an independent issue (I am going to agree with >> you in the end). > > Exactly. It might be nice to fix those two things (are there any > observed bugs?), but it is entirely orthogonal to our issue. OK. >> That is a correct observation. But it needed a bit of thinking to >> reach your conclusion that special casing this and handling --abort >> in a new different codepath is the right solution. > > Yeah, the commit message is lacking. OK. I'll queue this on 'pu', not in 'next' so that it can be rerolled. > I'll probably work on these follow-ups in the morning. Thanks for poking. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html