Re: [PATCH 3/3] rebase -i: write better reflog messages for start

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> t/status-help.  Looks seriously unrelated, and I'm breaking my head
> over it.  Any clues?

Damn it!  A recent commit is responsible for this avalanche in test
breakages: b397ea (status: show more info than "currently not on any
branch", 2013-03-13).  It re-implements a backward version of
grab_nth_branch_switch(): grab_1st_switch() essentially _relies_ on
the random unintended pollution that rebase writes to the reflog to
print a more useful (?) status :/

I have no choice but to completely redo this bit, and update all the
tests.  Let me know if there is some easy way to work around this that
I'm missing.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]