Re: [PATCH v5 00/31] Follow perlcritic's recommandations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Which commit is this based on?
>
> "git am" fails, whether I try from Junio's master, next or pu. My best
> try was from da608b124c76f8f7dba8a9d8f0bc8174b9744176. It seems you're
> based on a local commit which doesn't exist on Junio's end.
>
> Most commit in-flight are in next, so I guess rebasing the series on
> next would make it easier for Junio (we normally send patches against
> master as much as possible, see SubmittingPatches for more details).

This is why a wholesale updates like "use sq instead of dq when we
can", "always return; from a sub", etc. needs inter-developer
coordination.

I agree with you that it would probably be the easiest to build this
on top of the merge bewteen master, bp/mediawiki-credential, and
your mm/mediawiki-https-fail-message topics.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]