Re: [PATCH 2/3] Move copy_note_for_rewrite + friends from builtin/notes.c to notes-utils.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> This is a pure code movement of the machinery for copying notes to
>>>> rewritten objects. This code was located in builtin/notes.c for
>>>> historical reasons. In order to make it available to builtin/commit.c
>>>> it was declared in builtin.h. This was more of an accident of history
>>>> than a concious design, and we now want to make this machinery more
>>>> widely available.
>>>>
>>>> Hence, this patch moves the code into the new notes-utils.[hc] files
>>>> which are included into libgit.a. Except for adjusting #includes
>>>> accordingly, this patch merely moves the relevant functions verbatim
>>>> into the new files.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I wonder where you got that idea from. Did you come up with that out thin air?
>>
>> Obviously not. I should add
>>
>> Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> You are still not explaining where the idea came from. And you are
> doing that with the express purpose of annoying.

Truly, I am not trying to annoy anyone. I have not followed the
preceding discussion closely, and I wrote the patch based solely on
one paragraph from Junio's email[1].

> Where did the idea come from?

I got it from Junio. I do not know if I might have accidentally
plagiarized something you already submitted to the mailing list,
although I would be surprised if that was the case, since - as far as
I understand - you are opposed to this solution. Furthermore, I
thought you might not like having your name mentioned in a patch you
do not agree with, but if you think differently I have no problem
adding your name. I don't know what kind of attribution you would
prefer though:

Originally-envisioned-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>?
NAKed-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>?
Something else?


...Johan


[1]: Quoted from <7vehc8a05n.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> There is only one right solution.  If a useful function is buried in
> builtin/*.o as a historical accident (i.e. it started its life as a
> helper for that particular command, and nobody else used it from
> outside so far) and that makes it impossible to use the function
> from outside builtin/*.o, refactor the function and its callers and
> move it to libgit.a.

-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
www.herland.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]