On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:26:42PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:09:32PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> It's not removed. It's simply moved. > > > > Sorry about that, I wasn't paying enough attention. But why are you > > moving it? > > > > All other arguments to git am is set in git-rebase.sh, why just set > > -q just before the invokation in git-rebase--am.sh? > > Because the next patch checks if there's any arguments meant for 'git > am' to switch to am rebase mode. We shouldn't switch to that mode if > the only argument to 'git am' is going to be -q. Okay, that make sense. How about rephrase the commit message and add this explanation. It's really not a cleanup but a preparation for the next patch. If I was a maintainer and only got this patch I would reject it. Every patch in a patch serie should be justified to be applied as a single patch, yes? -- Med vänliga hälsningar Fredrik Gustafsson tel: 0733-608274 e-post: iveqy@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html