Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> Thank you for drafting a proposed CommunityGuidelines document; I think
>> such a document would be helpful. But I don't like the overall flavor
>> of your proposal; frankly, it sounds to me more like
>>
>> Documentation/GuidelinesForCommunityToBendOverBackwardsToLiveWithFCsProvocations
>
> It has nothing to do with Felipe. I've merely documented repeating
> patterns in fire threads as violations, in an attempt to avoid fires.
> I have not worked forward from axioms to derive "transcendentally
> desirable behavior", but rather backwards from a disaster to derive
> "patterns that have been shown to lead to large fires". Why? Because
> it's easier to derive unambiguous statements using my approach; as I
> will show shortly, there are various problems with your arguments.
>
> What gives you the impression that I documented everyone else's
> violations, but not Felipe's? ;)
It has become clear, also in discussion on IRC, that your preferred
approach is to fight the fires, attempting to extinguish flames as they
happen.
My approach -- and in my perception also that preferred by most of the
regulars who have spoken in this whole mess -- is that since there is a
fire hazard, it would be more effective firefighting to just remove the
hazard, thus preventing future fires.
I infer that in your view, there is an inalienable right for the fire
hazard to remain part of the community that you are not willing to give
up. I for one no longer have such qualms in this instance.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html