On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Phil Hord <phil.hord@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras >>> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > Same as before, but: >>> >>> Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because >>> apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not >>> part of this series. >> >> Please try not to sound disgruntled. This attitude is toxic. You have >> turned this change into a complaint: that "some people have trouble >> understanding" which shows a genuine lack of understanding and >> compassion on your part. Instead you can phrase your change notes >> more helpfully if you make changes only when you yourself actually >> believe the change should be made. If you cannot do this, perhaps you >> can pretend. > > That would be dishonest. Moreover, there wasn't a good reason to > remove these patches, I made it clear I added those patches only to > make sure the real patches of this series worked correctly. Also, I > clarified that to Thomas Rast[1], only to receive a totally > unconstructive comment[2]. > > Why don't you ask Thomas Rast to be more constructive[2]? > > Then Johan Herland uses that as an example of a constructive > comment[3]. Why don't you correct Johan Herland? I do not see what their comments have to do with your attitude. Aren't your own man with cogent self-will and personal responsibility? Why should I also have to consider these other emails which I have not bothered to read yet? > No, you pick the easy target: me. You seem to have mistaken me for someone else. Moreover, you seem to have mistaken you for someone else. You are the least easy target I know of on this list. Everyone else seems open to community standards. > I already dd more than my fair share by carrying these 36 patches > through several iterations, yet you ask *more* of me. Why don't you > ask more of the people that just hit reply on their MUA? > > Thomas' task was easy; he simply had to say "Oh, these aren't meant to > be applied, got it." > > [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227039 > [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227040 > [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227102 I did not comment on their posts because they did not catch my eye. Rebase and cherry-pick improvements are interesting to me, so I read your post. I will try not to make this mistake again. Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html