Re: [PATCH] build: get rid of the notion of a git library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That is what libgit.a _is_ now.  I do not mean to imply any additional
> judgement on what it could be. But if the goal is to make libgit.a
> "functions that programs outside git.git would want, and nothing else",
> we may want to additionally split out a "libgit-internal.a" consisting
> of code that is used by multiple externals in git, but which would not
> be appropriate for clients to use.

That might make sense, but that still doesn't clarify what belongs in
./*.o, and what belongs in ./builtin/*.o. And right now that creates a
mess where you have code shared between ./builtin/*.o that is defined
in cache.h (overlay_tree_on_cache), and some in builtin.h
(init_copy_notes_for_rewrite). And it's not clear what should be done
when code in ./*.o needs to access functionality in ./builtin/*.o,
specially if that code is only useful for git builtins, and nothing
else.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]