On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> +static void finish(struct replay_opts *opts)
>> +{
>> + if (opts->action != REPLAY_PICK)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + run_rewrite_hook(&rewritten, "cherry-pick");
>> + copy_rewrite_notes(&rewritten, "cherry-pick");
>> +}
>> +
>
> Ok, so I see that with the previous two commits, you automatically get
> handling of the notes.rewrite.cherry-pick variable and friends. This is
> good.
>
> However, there are some open points:
>
> * The docs in git-config(1) "notes.rewrite.cherry-pick" and githooks(5)
> "post-rewrite" and are now stale in so far as they contain a list of
> commands doing rewriting.
Fine.
--- a/builtin/sequencer.c
+++ b/builtin/sequencer.c
@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ static void finish(struct replay_opts *opts)
if (opts->action != REPLAY_PICK)
return;
- name = opts->action_name ? opts->action_name : "cherry-pick";
+ name = opts->action_name
- if (!*name)
+ if (!name || !*name)
return;
run_rewrite_hook(&rewritten, name);
Now, we won't run when 'git cherry-pick' is called, only when an
action-name is specified; when called from 'git rebase'.
> * This pretends to be cherry-pick even when the hook is called from
> rebase.
No.
http://mid.gmane.org/1370796057-25312-31-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx
> * githooks(5) documents explicitly that by the time post-rewrite is
> called, the notes have been rewritten. Your change does it in the
> opposite order.
OK.
But it doesn't matter, because the patch won't be applied.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html