On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Duy Nguyen wrote: >> I _think_ the reason is because git was never written as a reusable >> library in mind from the beginning. > > We cannot reverse-engineer intents, but I tend to agree with this. My > question is: so what? Is it impossible to do now? Nothing is impossible. My feeling is that no Git developers are interested in libgit2, so the idea of me contributing to libgit2 and leave libgit.a alone is more like a "we don't want no reorganization". Then wait until libgit2 is ready before considering using it in Git's core, but that's never going to happen if we don't first start to bring the two code-bases closer together. IOW; sweep the issue under the carpet. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html