Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] cherry-pick: add --skip-empty option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> Pretty much what it says on the tin.
>>>
>>> And a bit more, isn't it?
>>>
>>> The --keep-redundant-commits option implies the --allow-empty option
>>> and it was perfectly acceptable to give both.  By making sure that
>>> only at most one of -k-r-d, -a-e or -s-e is given, this forbids that
>>> usage.
>>>
>>> "It is implied so there is no *need* to give it redundantly" is
>>> different from "It is implied so you shouldn't give it redundantly".
>>
>> Remove that line then.
>
> That's what the submitter does.

Apparently "the submitter" does everything. It seems sending 800
patches in the past 3 months is not enough work for you.

And what's the point? If nobody is interested in shifting from shell
scripts to C, neither am I.

Consider this series abandoned.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]