Re: branch.<name>.pushremote not working with push.default simple or upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> This shows the "triangular" support in 1.8.3 is only half-finished;
>> the other half was discussed a few weeks ago ($gmane/224604)
>
> I intentionally omitted that detail, because it is not directly
> related to this bug.  We have to fix the existing simple and upstream,
> whether or not we introduce branch.<name>.push.  I've personally
> stopped working on branch.<name>.push, and am focusing on getting @{p}
> first (you've already seen a dirty wip).  The transport code
> underlying the push is dirty enough, and I'd first like to understand
> it before bolting on more features.
>
>> I think the
>> natural extension of the current end-user configuration would be to
>> redefine "upstream" mode to push to update the branch with the same
>> name
>
> Right, so does this work?

It might be a beginning of a change in the right direction (I didn't
check the codeflow), but given that the test that comes after the
one you removed is looking at branch->merge[0] and deciding what to
do, and branch.$name.merge should *never* affect anything when
remote.pushdefault or branch.$name.pushremote is in use while
deciding what is pushed out or if the push is allowed, I do not
think the removal of these five lines alone can possibly "work".

> diff --git a/builtin/push.c b/builtin/push.c
> index 2d84d10..b253a64 100644
> --- a/builtin/push.c
> +++ b/builtin/push.c
> @@ -137,11 +137,6 @@ static void setup_push_upstream(struct remote
>  	if (branch->merge_nr != 1)
>  		die(_("The current branch %s has multiple upstream branches, "
>  		    "refusing to push."), branch->name);
> -	if (strcmp(branch->remote_name, remote->name))
> -		die(_("You are pushing to remote '%s', which is not the upstream of\n"
> -		      "your current branch '%s', without telling me what to push\n"
> -		      "to update which remote branch."),
> -		    remote->name, branch->name);
>  	if (simple && strcmp(branch->refname, branch->merge[0]->src))
>  		die_push_simple(branch, remote);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]